Friday, June 12, 2015

MD1AssignKnucklesM



                                                              Image: Yournewskicker.com
I have a vested interest in the global implications of mobile technologies, having lived and worked as an educator in both the United States and West Africa. I see their emergence as gigantic in the ability to leap across continents and impact the way we view, receive and have the ability to deliver learning in an ever increasing capacity. Though the tablet is a strong contender for gigantic impact status, I believe nothing to date (and that could change tomorrow) has more potential to actualize the concept of globalization, inclusive of masses of underserved peoples needing the transformative social change and quality of life that access to information and education can provide via mobile devices. Emerging technologies I see as having the most adoptability and effectiveness of use, will need to address the pressing impediments to domestic and global adoption: cost and interoperability.

'Mobilifying' America 

Since the emergence of the smartphone in America in 2002, when PDA’s were enabled to make phone calls (Degusta, 2012), mobile technologies have been on a steady, albeit, arduous upward climb. Estimates project the mobile learning market could reach $32 billion by 2020. Research over the last forty years about the impact of digital technologies on learning consistently identifies positive benefits (Higgins, Xiao & Katsipataki, 2012). Control over and monitoring of students use of the devices for distractions rather than learning is a concern. Cyberbullying and safety headline today's news.  Skepticism over the efficacy of that impact to positively affect leaning outcomes was perhaps one of strongest deterrents to mainstream adoption. Attitudes and beliefs about the technology have been a challenge as the practices educators choose to employ are shaped by their knowledge, beliefs and attitudes (Cuban, 1993).  The fruits of efforts to change that bare out as recent statistics cite seventy-six percent of teachers stating mobile devices as boosting motivation, meeting the needs of diverse learning styles, and enhancing instruction by making it more engaging (Delaney, 2014). Mobile technologies seem to have escaped the chasm and become a standard feature in American schools where access to a smartphone is held by forty-five to eighty percent of the divisions of K-12 students (Delaney, 2014, p.2). The domestic front is experiencing the trend’s impact as well though some disparity is becoming evident. Sixty-three percent of children from high-income compared twenty percent of those from low-income homes have access to a tablet. Delaney’s statistics that overall, eighty percent of students in grades 9-12 have access to a smartphone and forty-five percent to a tablet.

'Mobilifying' the Developing World

In Africa and other developing regions of the world, access to learning is perhaps the most key societal need that mobile technologies can and is currently addressing. In lower-income countries, 64 million primary school-age children and 72 million lower secondary school-age children are not in school (Perlman, 2011).  The effects of armed conflict, lack of trained teachers, crumbling or non-existent infrastructure and the prohibitive costs of education in some of the poorest areas in the world contribute to the disparity. The ubiquity of mobile phones is enabling educators and development organizations new low-cost tools for teaching in some of the poorest and most remote communities.The developing world is still behind in terms of access to basic technologies like electricity, radio, wireless technology and computer access, some cutting edge innovations are being employed in these regions using mobile phones to solve everyday problems such as personal banking, paying government workers and monitoring HIV patients. 

The gaps are rapidly decreasing as the cost of mobile devices decreases and access to both electricity and affordable internet increases. Mobile phone coverage reaches larger segments of the developing world. penetration is seeing the largest increase over any other form of technology (Winthrop and Smith 2012, p.15). Mobile phones are the second most common technology with educational implications, with a seventy percent penetration in the developing world which is expected to steadily increase (ITU, 2011). I have been following the work of UNESCO in promoting eradicating illiteracy and other social ills through the promotion of digital literacy in their Information for All Programme (IFAP). They released a study in April of 2014 showing the effectiveness of mobile phones in promoting reading and literacy in developing countries. The benefits of mobile technologies are evident. The concern should now focus on what are the options, the obstacles and the mitigations for advancing mobile technologies for learning.

The Obstacles to Adoption: According to the Experts

Mobile technologies such as tablets and cell phones face social, technical and economic challenges to widespread adoption that are similar and particular to U.S and developing countries. In the U.S. leading technology experts like, Harvard graduate school of education’s, Christopher Dede, call attention to the reluctance to having cellphones that are active during school hours creating a “distraction factor” (Davis, 2010).The lack of interoperability of devices is an obstacle University of Michigan’s, Elliot Soloway, cites along with costs that facilitate 1-1 student-device capability (Davis, 2010). Cost consistently emerges as a preeminent hurdle both domestically and abroad. According to Cathleen A. Norris, a professor of learning technologies at the University of North Texas, building out a robust infrastructure that can accommodate every child in every classroom would cost anywhere from $75,000 to $100,000 (Davis, 2010, para. 5). Balance those costs with the fact that cellular providers are providing the devices at little or no cost to the school, making the handset practically free. 1-1 capability would seem a far more attainable goal.

Mitigating the Obstacles to Adoption

Changing the mindsets of schools, teachers and policy makers is going to require aggressive advocacy on the part of educational technologists. Assemblage and dissemination of the mounting literature on the effectiveness of mobile technologies to positively affect learning outcomes and best practice models will be needed. I think that the market and consumer demand for applications and devices that can be used across platforms is going to drive the design and release of devices that will be more easily adoptedThe same market factors will likely drive down the costs of  devices, along with competition for the lion’s share of the educational market, Decreased costs will subsequently make 1-1 capability more achievable. Security features are becoming standard in devices and should be in continual design as new threats continually arise. Applications that give teachers more control over monitoring students screens during classroom use of internet connected devices should be a factor in technology purchasing choices. 

Promising Emerging Mobile Learning Technologies

I am looking at two devices that have the greatest potential in my view to fulfill  as many of the requisites of efficient, cost effective, adopt-ability appeal need The Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 is an android device listed as number three of the five best mobile learning devices by LeanForward, a mobile learning company. The iPhone, iPad, Google Nexus 7 and Kindle Fire HD were: 1, 2, 4 and 5 respectively. All of these devices have stellar features from which educational technologist can choose the best fit for their organizations. My reasoning is influenced by my needs for tools that facilitate great access to greater numbers of learners. The iPad, for example, has thousands more apps than the Android Galaxy, but its costs exceed my choice and its interoperability fall shorter, The Kindle Fire is the lowest cost device of its kind on the market and is great for cutting costs on bulky textbooks, but lacks the interactive capabilities for student engagement and collaboration.

The ability to develop this device to your specific needs (Open Source Code) is the initial reason I chose it as a favorite. The interoperability level of Android and its affordability are the strongest determinants for me. With the money spent on the cheapest iPad, you may buy a few (minimum 3) Android tablets running the latest OS, with a dual-core processor. File Sharing is great with this device.  Teachers work with many audio files, videos, documents in various formats, and pictures. It is easy to share files, devices have extension slots and by SD cards you may swap files from computers or other devices.
The Samsung School Solution is an available feature that attained in a cost efficient bundle for schools that enables teachers to instantly share screen content from tablet or PC screens to an E-board and students’ personal devices. Teachers have a high level of control while increasing student engagement.

A mobile device with the potential to expand mobile learning in developing countries is the Elikia smartphone designed by Congo based company VMK Tech. The company released the Way-C tablet for 200.00 in 2011. Its smartphone models priced at $20.50, $34 and $112 with the premier Elikia still under 200.00 at 164.00 (Sanchez, 2015). It has a 3.5-inch (and 480 x 320) display, 512MB of RAM, a 650MHz processor and both 5-megapixel rear as well as front VGA cameras, and Android 2.3 Gingerbread (Elay, 2012). VMK focuses on the lower end of the market, which in Africa means millions of people since Africa after Asia, is the largest mobile phone market in the world. Familiarity with mobile technology is not nearly as big an obstacle as cost. Availability has been a limitation to widespread adoption but the company’s commitment to expansion into 5 countries by the end of 2015 pinpoints a good starting point for  mitigating that.

Final Thoughts

I see mobile technologies such as the tablet and smartphone as the future of education globally. These devices and mobile learning development will advance both the quality of, and access to, information and communication that actualizes and expands the concept of the global classroom. Mobile technologies can bridge the digital divide that exists even here in America and decrease the number of the underserved, worldwide.  The key to greater adoption is going to be in design. More innovators like VMK are needed for creating mobile devices specific to the logistical and infrastructural circumstances of the developing world. Research and development into the new solar powered devices and the renewed value of broadband for connecting the massive proliferation of mobile phones must ensue. Devices must continue to be made more interoperable and affordable. More applications must be designed for mobile content that is effective for outcome impact and culturally inclusive. We are seeing big leaps presently, but we will witness gigantic leaps not only in the rate of adoption of emerging mobile technology, but in the acceleration of desirable learning outcomes when these factors are addressed.

References

7 comments:

  1. Monica,
    I do agree with you that mobile learning is the way to go in education if educators plan to ride the futurist wave. Also, the benefits this type of learning has for my area of adult education is astronomical. My students who struggle to attend face to face classes would be given an awesome opportunity to get an education. (I know you are thinking globally but, I cannot help thinking about my current students. This time of year, with school out, we lose so many students until August.)

    You noted that a mitigating obstacle was the mindset of schools, teachers and policy makers, but I believe that the technological industry is also an obstacle. Most of these mobile devices are created solely for industry and consumer use and not education. Imagine if some of these mobile devices were geared towards education. I am not imagining education being a second thought but the sole purpose of the design and manufacturing of specific mobile devices for teachers and students. The textbook publishers have been design for teachers and students for years. They have made a profit right?

    If education technologist can finds a balanced zone between education and technology I believe that mobile learning will have a lasting impact in education.

    Did you know that mobile learning on the Gartner Hype Cycle 2014 is in the trough of disillusionment? Why do you think it is in that position in the cycle?
    Does it have a hope of hitting the slope of enlightenment?

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Monica,

    I agree with Vivia's comment; there seems to be a separation between the intended use of tablets for corporate purposes rather than educational. However, Apple usually releases their top selling educational apps along with annotated uses for them in their quarterly E-newsletters. I try to download every free app mentioned in the article to keep my iPad up to date. The residential facility I teach at recently received iPads for every teacher (there are 5 of us). I am the only one who actually downloaded apps for each of my classes (I teach 12 preps). The other teachers offer their iPads solely as an incentive for students who earn a break to watch videos and listen to music. I have tried to no avail to switch them over to downloading some of the apps I have on mine since we are all registered under the same name and share the cloud. There are dissection apps, apps for exploration, writing & reading intensive, and a plethora more that are subject specific. However, because having to search out their subject area takes time and energy, they avoid it. This, to me, appears to be a disservice to the students. I believe that if teachers are not actively progressing in their adoption of new technology and learning (in general), they are regressing. Just as Dr. Thornburg stated in our video resource “If the school’s haven’t picked up on the latest technology, they are laggards’ (Laureate Education (2014k). To be honest, it is rather frustrating. How do you intend to share your knowledge of how the tablet can revolutionize classrooms if teachers refuse to add one more thing to their already full plate of job duties?

    Reference:
    Laureate Education (Producer). (2014k). David Thornburg: What is emerging technology? [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nothing has charged my global battery more than the residency we attended together. Interacting with you and the international students has truly expanded my point of view regarding the adoption of global technology, and how it availability impacts or lack thereof impacts global education. Yes, the availability of portable technology is closing the education availability gap. However, your research accurately portrays the bleak dilemma of most developing nations. Ferranti, Perry, Gill, Guasch, Maloney, Sanchez-Paramo, and Schady (2003) stated, "Thus, countries with low levels of education remain in a trap of technological stagnation, low growth, and low demand for education (a reason why basic education must be highly subsidized everywhere" (p. 7). I look forward to reading more of your research on this very topic.

    References

    De Ferranti, D. Perry, G. E., Gill, I, Guasch, J. L., Maloney, W. F., Sanchez-Paramo, C., & Schady, N. (2003). Closing the gap in education and technology. The World Bank. Retrieved June 13, 2015 from http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:0ObiZJ2-2tsJ:https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/15168+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is an excellent post! I wonder what your thoughts are on Mark Zuckerberg's recent attempts to get limited social media into the hands of the world's poorer citizens via cell phone. I understand he wishes for these people to access the internet via facebook. It's an interesting model!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Excellent post Nica, and discussion here. In attending a Tech Summit here last week, there was much discussion about mobile devices in the BYOD workshop. It is true that teachers, administrators, and especially the I.T. staff are showing laggard characteristics in contemplating how they intend to keep their school networks secure in allowing students to use their mobile devices. A drastic contrast to the survival aspect of learners in West Africa who might just have an opportunity to reach educational materials with the devices you have shown to us in your post. The solar-powered device certainly caught my attention and so many other points within this discussion. Especially the Gartner reference regarding the trough of disillusionment verses the slope of enlightenment. Could the attitude of education technologists perhaps have something to do with this statistic?

    References

    Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Chapter 10. Innovation in organizations. (5th ed.) New York, NY: Free Press.

    Utah Education Network. (2015). Tech Summit. Retrieved from http://www.uen.org/summit/schedule.shtml

    ReplyDelete
  7. M2 Peer Blog - Delfyett, D.

    Monica,

    You noted in your blog that one of the characteristics of MOOCs is that it enhances professional development. How right you are! This would certainly be a welcomed forum for educators in pursuit of convenient courses for staff development, increased knowledge acquisition, and certification renewal.

    I must tell you, I have spent over $5,000 in professional development courses, e.g., reading endorsement, gifted endorsement, and ESOL endorsement. Although these courses are offered at the district level and some at the state level, scheduling has always been a challenge. The courses are offered during the school year rather than during the summer. As an Exceptional Student Education teacher, several of my major responsibilities are Individual Education Plans (IEPs), gifted Academic Plans (AP), mentoring, and monitoring students on my case load. These are state and federally regulated teacher responsibilities. This year, I have only 16 students on my caseload. Believe it or not, this is considered a low number of students. In the past, I have had as many as 30 students on my caseload.

    It would indeed be a dream to be able to take MOOCs at one's own convenience and at one's own pace. The savings would certainly make up for the lack of appropriate salary. Hopefully, districts will see the benefits of offering this learning option to teachers. Thanks for such a well researched post.

    ReplyDelete